Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Age of Infovores's avatar

More to the point of the article, it is becoming increasingly apparent that peer review does not work for finding errors in academic research. Refereeing a manuscript is primarily about rendering an aesthetic judgement.

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

Expand full comment
A. Klarke Heinecke's avatar

Glad your work is reaching a larger audience.

My spouse reviews many medical research papers and grant proposals. His opinion is that people are becoming much more sloppy with interpretation and analysis of data. He asks the hard questions and this is not always popular.

Go after those fraudsters. Get them. The integrity of science and economics depend on people who are willing to do that , who do not need to fear their own grants will be unfunded in retaliation.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts