10 Comments

Great work. Keep the pressure on. Someone affected and pissed needs to think about litigation and send a preservation letter to all the parties - Yale, the three knuckleheads who did this, AND Mastadon itself. The latter will have backup tapes.

Expand full comment

No, Mastodon won't. Mastodon isn't a centralized service, like Twitter; it's decentralized, like email. The server admins might have backups, but if they're doing it in their spare time, they might not.

Expand full comment

Damn, kid!

How many more vitamins can I take? I really want to be around when they write books about you.

Expand full comment

Is this a good thing or bad thing for the good guys? So much going on here for those, like myself, not in the know it’s hard to know.

Expand full comment
author

good in the sense that it's a tacit admission of guilt -- destruction of evidence during a lawsuit can results in sanctions including the presumption of guilt

bad in the sense that once it was destroyed, it will be impossible to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Mastodon was a blackmail operation

Expand full comment

Depends on Mastadon's backup system and schedule. It might still be available - assuming someone aggrieved sends a preservation letter out.

Expand full comment

What backup system? Mastadon is a distributed protocol, it's up to each instance to run its own servers.

Expand full comment

OK, you are way ahead of me. Someone backs up, perhaps the "instance" else they constantly risk failure. If I have that wrong, then I'll desist. Maybe I should already!

Expand full comment

Generally it's the responsibility of whoever runs each instance manage his own backups.

Expand full comment

Yeah, maybe it would have been better to sue them first.

Expand full comment