10 Comments
User's avatar
Running Burning Man's avatar

Great work. Keep the pressure on. Someone affected and pissed needs to think about litigation and send a preservation letter to all the parties - Yale, the three knuckleheads who did this, AND Mastadon itself. The latter will have backup tapes.

Expand full comment
Eric Brown's avatar

No, Mastodon won't. Mastodon isn't a centralized service, like Twitter; it's decentralized, like email. The server admins might have backups, but if they're doing it in their spare time, they might not.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Damn, kid!

How many more vitamins can I take? I really want to be around when they write books about you.

Expand full comment
Josh Scandlen's avatar

Is this a good thing or bad thing for the good guys? So much going on here for those, like myself, not in the know it’s hard to know.

Expand full comment
Christopher Brunet's avatar

good in the sense that it's a tacit admission of guilt -- destruction of evidence during a lawsuit can results in sanctions including the presumption of guilt

bad in the sense that once it was destroyed, it will be impossible to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Mastodon was a blackmail operation

Expand full comment
Running Burning Man's avatar

Depends on Mastadon's backup system and schedule. It might still be available - assuming someone aggrieved sends a preservation letter out.

Expand full comment
Eugine Nier's avatar

What backup system? Mastadon is a distributed protocol, it's up to each instance to run its own servers.

Expand full comment
Running Burning Man's avatar

OK, you are way ahead of me. Someone backs up, perhaps the "instance" else they constantly risk failure. If I have that wrong, then I'll desist. Maybe I should already!

Expand full comment
Eugine Nier's avatar

Generally it's the responsibility of whoever runs each instance manage his own backups.

Expand full comment
Diana Murray's avatar

Yeah, maybe it would have been better to sue them first.

Expand full comment