The Canadian Censorship Bill will become law. They can't not push it through now.
They're going to push everything from this point on. It's do or die for the globalists. They've lost the narrative on vaccines, Ukraine, and everyone knows what they're doing to Trump. They have nothing left.
Re: YouTube - What happened to "It's a private company, we can't tell it what to do"? Wasn't this what we were told when we complained of social media platforms deplatforming and shadow-banning conservative voices? Oh, right. Turns out those "private companies" were actually puppets of the government. It was only a step away from doing the same thing, but now "legally" and in the clear.
"If it is time to bury your guns, it is time to dig them up."
Re royal assent ... it would come from the Governor General, not King Charles. It used to come from the monarch, which is why it was called royal assent.
It's a formality. In theory the GG could veto a bill. I believe this happened once (maybe it was in Australia, though). The idea of keeping it is that somehow it will be a roadblock for the next Hitler, which sounds retarded in a dozen different ways, but that's the idea behind keeping it.
The Canadian Censorship Bill will become law. They can't not push it through now.
They're going to push everything from this point on. It's do or die for the globalists. They've lost the narrative on vaccines, Ukraine, and everyone knows what they're doing to Trump. They have nothing left.
Re: YouTube - What happened to "It's a private company, we can't tell it what to do"? Wasn't this what we were told when we complained of social media platforms deplatforming and shadow-banning conservative voices? Oh, right. Turns out those "private companies" were actually puppets of the government. It was only a step away from doing the same thing, but now "legally" and in the clear.
"If it is time to bury your guns, it is time to dig them up."
YouTuber Pat RMG
Trudeau is a hard core full blooded Marxist in more ways than one
Re royal assent ... it would come from the Governor General, not King Charles. It used to come from the monarch, which is why it was called royal assent.
It's a formality. In theory the GG could veto a bill. I believe this happened once (maybe it was in Australia, though). The idea of keeping it is that somehow it will be a roadblock for the next Hitler, which sounds retarded in a dozen different ways, but that's the idea behind keeping it.