Sorry, friends, I have not been very productive on Substack lately.
I will be returning to writing soon full-time.
In the meantime, it would mean a lot to me if you would please watch this video. Nick’s latest video offers the clearest, most comprehensive breakdown I’ve seen of my current situation... I’m grateful for his help in exposing the truth.
NOTE:
I misclicked and accidently deleted the top comment in this section, it was written by a subscriber named David Silverberg. It was an excellent and thoughtful comment, It really was a misclick, I could not be sorrier to him for deleting. Fortunately I saved a screenshot, and I will retype the whole thing.
I tweeted it out:
https://x.com/realChrisBrunet/status/1848003134771106059
This is what he wrote:
''Hi Chris,
I listened carefully to the story Nick had to tell. In short, you uncovered plagiarism by the Israeli wife of Bill Ackman, a big Harvard donor, and and feel it should be publicized and you got no help from Chris Rufo - allegedly because of his Jewish donor. And you have concluded this is because of unwarranted foreign influence of Jews and the State of Israel on America.
Let me be blunt.
I see many problems with your story if I am to believe what Nick said - and I have no reason no to believe the facts stated by Nick.
- First of all, nobody is suppressing your story. You cannot force Chris Rufo to agree to help you.
- To say Mr Rufo did not help you because he has a major Jewish or Israeli donor does not mean that is why he did not help you.
- Suggesting Israeli and Jews are, by definition, actors working for the State of Israel is nonsense at best, and anti-semitic at worst.
- Suggesting Chris Rufo does not have his own opinions and is a puppet of Jews, just because you do not get your way, speaks more about you than Mr Rufo
- I think it makes more sense that Rufo does not agree with you agenda regardless of donors.
- The plagiarism at the presidency of Harvard cannoc compare to the plagiarism of a rich Donor's wife. They only share one common thing - that both did bad things.
- The suggestion that the Donor kicked out Ms Gay, appears to suggest she was the victim and that the ''jews'' were up to some sort of illicit evil conduct to oust her when the opposite was true - Ms Gay used her woke colonizer-colonized theories to do nothing when many students at Harvard proclaimed their support for genocide of Jews and terrorized Jews on campus - in contrast to the school's despicable treatment of conservatives on campus.
- To say the ''Jews'' are to blame for the demise of Ms Gay because she did nothing about the pro-genocide protestors (and that the Jews were less concerning about the plagiarism is likely true. So what? Did you want Jews to be okay with people advocating genocide of Jews? Is that a bad thing? Funny how you blame American Jews when they were the victims in this situation.
- You discount the fact most conservatives, Jewish or not, would recognize the monumental difference between plagiarism by Ms Gay, a Harvard president, and what that represents, vs. plagiarism by the Israeli wife of Ackman, a big donor to Harvard.
- In the end, there are many successful Jewish people in the US. But thinking Jewish support for our ally Israel is somehow a form of foreign influence is (1) an insult to Americans who are not Jewish who favor Western democracies over terrorist groups, and (2) it implies Jews or Israeli Americans are less American. Jews were among the first settlers in the US. Hey, they just discovered Christopher Columbus had a Sephardic Jewish heritage.
- In the final analysis, I think it is fair to tell people Bill Ackman's wife is a plagiarist. But if you think it warrants the same attention as your previous work with Ms Gay (work which I fully respect) then I question whether your frustration is really about Jews or your inability to repeat your previous success. Just saying''
Hang in there.