As someone with a limited background in econ I can vouch that it's largely court magic for modern royalty. Environmental economic theory begins to bridge the gap in evaluating GDP growth as mainstream econ fails to properly account for energy consumption which is tied almost 1-to-1 with wealth.
I like both the current, slightly more verbally reserved Karlstack, and the older one with no holds barred! It is your content that matters. If you want to express some contemptuous outrage, that is fine, too!
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/karl-declares-neutrality-over-israelpalestine
Apparently left it a bit salty
I'm totally out of the loop on this but this is an awesome primer and torching
I just set up https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=EJMR
Yep, lib fellow travelers sure stand exposed after that Wu controversy -- probably the first time we've seen the mask slip a smidge.
This is the EJMR link that works for me.
https://www.econjobrumors.com
As someone with a limited background in econ I can vouch that it's largely court magic for modern royalty. Environmental economic theory begins to bridge the gap in evaluating GDP growth as mainstream econ fails to properly account for energy consumption which is tied almost 1-to-1 with wealth.
Interview I'd recommend for those interested: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LCTa4kEPl0&list=PLdc087VsWiC4Nwh42Sm5hHpu2OGgi-Ez1&index=57
I like both the current, slightly more verbally reserved Karlstack, and the older one with no holds barred! It is your content that matters. If you want to express some contemptuous outrage, that is fine, too!