F to Ms are just bearded ladies who want to settle down with a girl and dog and lay low (for the most part).
But M to Fs are psychotic bullies who would kill all of us to maintain their sacred illusion and protect their incredibly fragile sense of self (takes a lot of cognitive dissonance to maintain an obvious absurdity every time you leave the house).
Steer clear of these people, they will destroy you and your family and pretend it was for "Justice".
They are state-sanctioned psychos—warn your friends!
Not much was made of the fact that the Highland Park, Illinois parade shooter was wearing women's clothes. When mentioned at all it was spun as a "disguise."
[just removed the "like" I tend to apply to your work even before I've read it]
I think this is the wrong approach, though I understand your feelings. Right now this is a battle between two religious viewpoints: wokeism and Christian sensibilities. The woke-comfortable will go to or send their kids to woke institutions, and outraged Christians will seek out institutions like Hillsdale.
What about people of varied, independent viewpoints, or less-observant or merely cultural members of various faith traditions, who want these elite institutions to get back to good educating and intellectual exploration without fear?
Let Brown or whoever hire our Sarah as they will. They'll need to completely wreck themselves before this can start to reverse. Hiring awful people of their own free will, and seeing how well that works out, is a necessary stage to go through.
Meanwhile put every possible pressure on what used to be our elite public institutions to return to their former strengths. There was considerable outcry about the speaker at NYU Law School's recent commencement. Make such foolish choices come with real consequences. Not with cries to restrict the free speech of the wretched, but a loss of elite applicants. Let the Ivies lose all their glamour so they'll need to build it back again. This is gonna be generations' work.
Perhaps consider, in a future post, a list of still-decent, in practical fields of study, schools that are still worth going to for a variety of reasons, and how they might be kept that way.
Fascinating that this person effectively published your unpublished article... ps, you probably know this, but "curteousy" is a typo (it's "courtesy").
However, to specifically your line "Should Sarah Celeste Griffith be allowed to own a gun?", the answer is indubitably yes just like any other American
Good article. I will for sure be vocal should this guy apply for a position at my institution.
A funny fact about the math community: they are extremely racist when hiring tenure-track positions. When I was on the job market (btw, I am Asian), I was told at two different universities (one in PA and the other in CA) that they will not hire any Asian. Instead they want to hire someone that is "more diverse", presumably PoC \setminus ({Asian} \cup {white}) or LGBTQ. In the end I had four on-site interviews, all of which are in conservative states. I wonder why...
Here’s my answer: Brown University breeds and enables a cannibalistic kind of moral narcissism through its cultural heritage of hedonistic and compete-to-the-death sense of humor. They’ll have their fun no matter the cost: if you ain’t with them, you’re against them; but they often can’t tell if you’re even with them when you are (in certain respects).
Of course, I speak of only those who fasten themselves firmly to the Brown identity; many regret their choice and stay for the few who truly respect the Open Curriculum’s ambitions of embracing learning as independent of social achievement.
Note: I graduated from Brown University, largely mortified by their community’s norms as an earnest liberal.
If someone tells you that he is Napoleon are you required to agree with him? If you fail to endorse his delusions are you being Napoleonphobic? It it exactly the same situation if a man tells you that he is a woman. No one can change their biological sex. The mentally ill are entitled to freely live their lives with sympathy and care but not forced acceptance of their fantasies.
Apparently, the comments have shown who reads this guy, imbecile hate ridden incels who wish to murder or control LGBTQ. Good job guy, you really picked some low hanging fruit to pander to insane would-be murderers. Notice that calls for Big Gov to legislate the private behavior of consenting adults? As a small gov republican I'm sickened by the decay of my party.
The left wins in the long-term. Every position the right holds now would be leftist just 20 years ago and on the extreme-far left 100 years ago. You can keep doing this for centuries and see that the left has been winning in the long-term because conservatives want to keep things the way they are, meanwhile the left pushes harder and harder to "progress". The future will be not be libertarian. The future moderate position will be current-day's far-left positions.
"The Paretian position says they are acting rationally, and are lying about why they are behaving how they are. The mind virus they claim to have is only the maximization of their utility with regards to the act of speaking given their real, hidden priors. Their private behavior should reveal that they do not have the mind virus priors they claim to have, because they do not bear the expected costs that we would expect, given they actually possess those priors. "
This PhD student at Brown University keeps threatening to murder Matt Walsh
Do not mess with the M to Fs...they nuts!
F to Ms are just bearded ladies who want to settle down with a girl and dog and lay low (for the most part).
But M to Fs are psychotic bullies who would kill all of us to maintain their sacred illusion and protect their incredibly fragile sense of self (takes a lot of cognitive dissonance to maintain an obvious absurdity every time you leave the house).
Steer clear of these people, they will destroy you and your family and pretend it was for "Justice".
They are state-sanctioned psychos—warn your friends!
Nice to see my alma mater continuing to attract the clinically insane. Here’s a sampling of Woke theses a few years ago: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-write-a-thesis-dei
Given the high levels of aggression displayed by this guy, I'm thinking autogynophile.
Great. Now I'm going to stare in the mirror to see if I have psychotic eyes.
These people are sick and a threat to civil society. THey should be denied jobs, censured and monitored by the criminal justice system.
Not much was made of the fact that the Highland Park, Illinois parade shooter was wearing women's clothes. When mentioned at all it was spun as a "disguise."
[just removed the "like" I tend to apply to your work even before I've read it]
I think this is the wrong approach, though I understand your feelings. Right now this is a battle between two religious viewpoints: wokeism and Christian sensibilities. The woke-comfortable will go to or send their kids to woke institutions, and outraged Christians will seek out institutions like Hillsdale.
What about people of varied, independent viewpoints, or less-observant or merely cultural members of various faith traditions, who want these elite institutions to get back to good educating and intellectual exploration without fear?
Let Brown or whoever hire our Sarah as they will. They'll need to completely wreck themselves before this can start to reverse. Hiring awful people of their own free will, and seeing how well that works out, is a necessary stage to go through.
Meanwhile put every possible pressure on what used to be our elite public institutions to return to their former strengths. There was considerable outcry about the speaker at NYU Law School's recent commencement. Make such foolish choices come with real consequences. Not with cries to restrict the free speech of the wretched, but a loss of elite applicants. Let the Ivies lose all their glamour so they'll need to build it back again. This is gonna be generations' work.
Perhaps consider, in a future post, a list of still-decent, in practical fields of study, schools that are still worth going to for a variety of reasons, and how they might be kept that way.
Fascinating that this person effectively published your unpublished article... ps, you probably know this, but "curteousy" is a typo (it's "courtesy").
Great article!
However, to specifically your line "Should Sarah Celeste Griffith be allowed to own a gun?", the answer is indubitably yes just like any other American
Good article. I will for sure be vocal should this guy apply for a position at my institution.
A funny fact about the math community: they are extremely racist when hiring tenure-track positions. When I was on the job market (btw, I am Asian), I was told at two different universities (one in PA and the other in CA) that they will not hire any Asian. Instead they want to hire someone that is "more diverse", presumably PoC \setminus ({Asian} \cup {white}) or LGBTQ. In the end I had four on-site interviews, all of which are in conservative states. I wonder why...
Griffith has set his twitter account to private. He is clearly afraid of being asked about his threats.
Here’s my answer: Brown University breeds and enables a cannibalistic kind of moral narcissism through its cultural heritage of hedonistic and compete-to-the-death sense of humor. They’ll have their fun no matter the cost: if you ain’t with them, you’re against them; but they often can’t tell if you’re even with them when you are (in certain respects).
Of course, I speak of only those who fasten themselves firmly to the Brown identity; many regret their choice and stay for the few who truly respect the Open Curriculum’s ambitions of embracing learning as independent of social achievement.
Note: I graduated from Brown University, largely mortified by their community’s norms as an earnest liberal.
If someone tells you that he is Napoleon are you required to agree with him? If you fail to endorse his delusions are you being Napoleonphobic? It it exactly the same situation if a man tells you that he is a woman. No one can change their biological sex. The mentally ill are entitled to freely live their lives with sympathy and care but not forced acceptance of their fantasies.
Apparently, the comments have shown who reads this guy, imbecile hate ridden incels who wish to murder or control LGBTQ. Good job guy, you really picked some low hanging fruit to pander to insane would-be murderers. Notice that calls for Big Gov to legislate the private behavior of consenting adults? As a small gov republican I'm sickened by the decay of my party.
The left wins in the long-term. Every position the right holds now would be leftist just 20 years ago and on the extreme-far left 100 years ago. You can keep doing this for centuries and see that the left has been winning in the long-term because conservatives want to keep things the way they are, meanwhile the left pushes harder and harder to "progress". The future will be not be libertarian. The future moderate position will be current-day's far-left positions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6LUjUbikkk
Woke Mind Virus Theory is wrong:
https://josephbronski.substack.com/p/how-to-test-theories-of-memetics?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
"The Paretian position says they are acting rationally, and are lying about why they are behaving how they are. The mind virus they claim to have is only the maximization of their utility with regards to the act of speaking given their real, hidden priors. Their private behavior should reveal that they do not have the mind virus priors they claim to have, because they do not bear the expected costs that we would expect, given they actually possess those priors. "