I hate to say this, because I do like Noah, but I have not read much of him since he reposted that CBDC article from last year (that I had not previously seen). Kind of regret becoming a paid subscriber of him now.
Follow him long enough and you'll eventually spot a thousand instances of "cocktail party conversation training" in his work. I'm not uncertain that he was not a trained propagandist from the start.
I agree with your conclusion. I that it were easier to fit the following physical objection to specific applications of A.I. more easily, but hopefully this helps with additional perspective. There are inherent limits to the complexity that A.I. can handle (and that's a good thing for humanity).
I hate to say this, because I do like Noah, but I have not read much of him since he reposted that CBDC article from last year (that I had not previously seen). Kind of regret becoming a paid subscriber of him now.
Follow him long enough and you'll eventually spot a thousand instances of "cocktail party conversation training" in his work. I'm not uncertain that he was not a trained propagandist from the start.
I agree with your conclusion. I that it were easier to fit the following physical objection to specific applications of A.I. more easily, but hopefully this helps with additional perspective. There are inherent limits to the complexity that A.I. can handle (and that's a good thing for humanity).
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/monkeys-typing-shakespeare-the-impossible