Great analysis. Unfortunately, the folks pushing this bullshittery do not care about facts or logic, and they've convinced a significant chunk of the population (and worse, a large percentage of voters, living and deceased) to disregard facts and logic and to wear their wilful ignorance and motivated reasoning as a badge of honor. We need a great reset, just not the one those clowns are trying to engineer. Some Nuremberg trials of the con-artists behind the plandemic and the 2020 riots and the whole BLM grift would be a great start.
Thanks for another excellent challenge to appalling use of data.
The first graph alone would not have passed muster with a "hard" scientist. Learning that the points were aggregated into bins, and that the bins were not commensurate in characteristics, was just icing on a rotten cake.
This farcical paper passed peer review? What low caliber of review if so.
If OJ Simpson had been lynched rather than be set free by a joke of a court system, wouldn't that have been a better example of justice? How about Darrell Brooks? All this pearl clutching about lynching is based on introducing a false premise that it was innocent people being lynched. When the premise is that they were guilty, it changes things entirely. And when it is guilty people who are set free by the courts, it seems a better alternative.
When was the last lynching in America? What state? Out of my head, I would say in the 1960’s, in Mississippi. That is statistically irrelevant in 2022 and I did not need to do any research.
Great analysis. Unfortunately, the folks pushing this bullshittery do not care about facts or logic, and they've convinced a significant chunk of the population (and worse, a large percentage of voters, living and deceased) to disregard facts and logic and to wear their wilful ignorance and motivated reasoning as a badge of honor. We need a great reset, just not the one those clowns are trying to engineer. Some Nuremberg trials of the con-artists behind the plandemic and the 2020 riots and the whole BLM grift would be a great start.
Thanks for another excellent challenge to appalling use of data.
The first graph alone would not have passed muster with a "hard" scientist. Learning that the points were aggregated into bins, and that the bins were not commensurate in characteristics, was just icing on a rotten cake.
This farcical paper passed peer review? What low caliber of review if so.
What you are doing is important.
If OJ Simpson had been lynched rather than be set free by a joke of a court system, wouldn't that have been a better example of justice? How about Darrell Brooks? All this pearl clutching about lynching is based on introducing a false premise that it was innocent people being lynched. When the premise is that they were guilty, it changes things entirely. And when it is guilty people who are set free by the courts, it seems a better alternative.
When was the last lynching in America? What state? Out of my head, I would say in the 1960’s, in Mississippi. That is statistically irrelevant in 2022 and I did not need to do any research.